Skip to content
Bordercase

Notes

Tax Strategy· 6 min read

Choosing between Caribbean CBI programmes in 2026: a comparison framework

St Kitts, Antigua, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Lucia - all viable CBI programmes. The comparison that actually matters is fit, not headline cost.

Cross-border movers considering Caribbean CBI face a menu of five major programmes - St Kitts and Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, Saint Lucia - plus newer options that have been added over time. The marketing tends to focus on cost and visa-free count, but the comparison that actually matters in 2026 is fit for the specific case.

The framework we use:

1. The case profile

  • Family composition: number of dependants, ages, structure. Affects per-dependant fees, qualifying-family definitions, and which programme is most economic.
  • Source-of-funds clarity: every programme requires this. Cases with cleaner stories have more programme choice.
  • Sector exposure: some sectors face additional scrutiny across all programmes; some only in specific ones.
  • Jurisdictional exposure: nationality and current-residence restrictions vary; the available programmes filter accordingly.

2. The strategic goal

  • Travel optionality: which destinations matter for visa-free access in this case?
  • US business presence: Grenada's E-2 treaty access is distinctive.
  • Family planning: which programme accommodates the family structure most cleanly?
  • Political risk hedging: where is the primary residence at risk, and which CBI most reduces that risk?
  • Optionality only: the lowest-friction programme may be the right choice.

3. The operational dimension

  • Presence requirement: Antigua specifically requires presence days; others don't. Plan accordingly.
  • Processing timeline: all programmes have published target timelines but real timelines vary by case complexity and current backlog.
  • Due-diligence rigor: convergent across programmes but with style differences.
  • Authorised agent network: some agents and law firms operate across all programmes; others specialise.

4. The cost picture

  • Headline contribution / investment vs total cost: government fees, due-diligence fees, agent fees, legal fees all add up.
  • Per-dependant economics: differs meaningfully by programme; the right choice for a family of two differs from a family of six.
  • Real-estate route economics: hold period, exit market depth, ongoing carry cost.

5. Long-term considerations

  • Visa-policy stability: which destinations matter, and how stable are their relationships with the issuing country?
  • Programme stability: programmes are revised; pick one that feels stable on current trajectory.
  • Tax-residence consequences: which programme aligns with the planned tax-residence path?
  • Banking implications: post-citizenship banking experiences differ subtly by issuing country.

What we tell cases

  • Pick the programme deliberately on the basis of the case profile, not the marketing.
  • For most cases the right choice is "good enough" rather than "headline cheapest" or "headline most respected."
  • Use a serious authorised agent or law firm with cross-programme experience.
  • Document everything as if every programme will read it - some do.
  • Plan tax residence and banking separately from the CBI choice.

The Caribbean CBI menu rewards considered choice.

Bordercase notes are informational and do not constitute legal, tax, or fiduciary advice.